top of page

Resisting Arrest


So here's what happens: The police, in their efforts to protect privilege and property, designate some disempowered "perpetrator" guilty of an imagined crime in order to set an example either to others in the group the "perpetrator" belongs to, or to impress those the police view as in power at that time.

When the officers try to take physical control of the designated "perpetrator' anything that person does - or does not do - is labelled 'resisting arrest," a crime they can be charged with even if it is later shown that they were guilty of nothing else. Even if it is clear and evident that the police had no reason to harass in any way the now-understood innocent-of-any-original-crime person they are still charged with resisting arrest, and any violence done to that innocent person by the police during their arrest is seen as justified.


"Resisting arrest" is the catch-all crime protestors, strikers, and all non-Whites can be charged with - even when they didn't.


So my point is - I think we need to decriminalize resisting arrest.


If someone is suspected of a crime they should be arrested for that crime, not for their reaction to being arrested, as the very existence of that resistance is subjective. "Oh, they rolled over while i was trying to cuff them!" "They refused to allow me to use a choke hold." And if someone actually assaults a police officer that is a crime, but a police officer can throw a "resisting arrest" accusation at anyone they want, and it is far too vague a term to have any standing in law.

Think of every bit of video you’ve seen in which a person is being brutalized of murdered by the police. Each time the justification was they were “resisting.” From Rodney King to George Floyd, for well over a century before and until the day we stop this taxpayer-sponsored thuggery the police have and will always use “resisting arrest” as the reason they cracked that skull, broke that arm, pulled their gun and pulled that trigger.


But - and this is key - “resisting arrest” is the criminal charge that police always, always level against anyone they want, any time they want, and it is unquestioned! Even if there is video evidence to the contrary. The police will say “the video doesn’t show everything,” that “You don’t know what happened before the video started.”


It’s almost like if they didn’t even know or care how the laws of evidence work…


And the police don’t even have to identify themselves as police, they can be in plainclothes, can charge up and smack you over the head, and if you make any move to escape this assault, or defend yourself, or neither you can and will be charged with “resisting.” The very idea that the police can do anything they want to you - anything - and then defend that action by charging you with “resisting” is fundamental to the lawlessness of the police state - a state in which the police are above the law, where the police define the law.


The fact is "resisting arrest" is just an arbitrary, catch-all charge that can be applied to anyone, anywhere when confronted by the police, and should be abolished as a crime.

6 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

1984 at the Aurora Theatre

Well 1984 FINALLY had a run in the Bay Area! I mean damn! People kept asking me why it took so long for it to run in my home area, and all I could tell tem was "go ask the Artistic Directors." Josh at

The Die is…

Caesar stood at the water's edge, on its very shore. The Rubicon. A small river. Shallow. An unimportant watercourse which served at this moment as boundary of peace. On the other side the catastrophi

The Good Dog - Chapter 4

We walked back home in silence without a single woof or meow. Every once in a while I stole a look at the cat, who seemed both casual and deep in thought. Maybe all cats are like that – casually inten

Comments


bottom of page